Monthly Archive for November, 2007

Gmail for Mobile App v1.5.0.1161

Many users have found that the latest release of the Gmail Mobile App v1.5.0.1161 is broken when trying to compose, reply or forward email when using Sony Ericsson mobile phones. I have also encountered this problem.

I have been trying to find the latest, fully operational, full screen version but to no avail; previous to the currently available version. I have also had no luck from the Gmail Groups Mobile Help. There does seem to be an ever increasing number of frustrated users!

I have found version 1.5.0.1132 which is fully operational, however it doesn’t appear to function in the same manner as the previous versions. For example, the soft keys show menu and refresh, left and right respectively and the app doesn’t fill the screen. Other than this it seems to work fine.

The download is available through the Google Operating System Blog or a direct download link is available by clicking here. There is also a direct link to version 1.1.1, this can be downloaded by clicking here. I will also post this onto the Google Groups support blog.

I just hope that Google will resolve the issues with version 1.5.0.1161 as soon as possible!

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Links for 26th November 2007

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Variable Web Hosting Features

I currently host the majority of my websites through Fasthosts and have found them to be excellent; both with the service they provide and the top notch support I have received.

In July 2007, I noticed that 1&1 had a special offer of 1 years free registration on .uk domains so I gladly accepted. The service has been excellent and have recently looked into purchasing a hosting package with them. After reading my previous edition of the .Net Magazine (an excellent read, very well recommended), they commented on hosting options. One paragraph mentioned about hosting in the US. This struck a chord and due to my current needs, I researched what 1&1 offer their users in the US compared to the UK. When comparing the two Linux Beginner Packages, the basics vary enormously - See table below.

After discovering this information, I thought it prudent to contact 1&1 in the UK to find out why there are such variations in their packages. A member of staff promptly emailed back with the follow comment. “The marketing competition ins US is very strong and we need to be competitive to stay on the Business. We are only basing our offered features on the marketing competition within the area”.

This is all fair and well, but is it the users fault that there isn’t the competition in the UK and therefore should they be paying the price as a result?

I think I’ll keep my sites with Fasthosts!

Feature UK US
Web Space 250 MB 10 GB
Traffic 3 GB 300 GB
Included Domains None 1
Sub domains 5 25
Email Accounts (2GB Inbox) 20 600
Email Aliases 250 800
MySQL Databases (100 MB) None 10 MB
PHP 4 & 5 No Support Supported
FrontPage Server Extensions No Support Support
Ready-to-Run CGI Library Not Available Available
Cost: £1.99 (£2.34 Inc VAT) £1.94 ($3.99)

These details were obtained from the respective websites (www.1and1.com and www.1and1.co.uk) at 17:00 hrs on the 21st November 2007. The exchange rate is 0.4856 using the Yahoo! Currency Converter at 17:35 on 21st November 2007.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Links for the 21st November 2007

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

How safe is our personal information?

Chancellor Alistair Darling yesterday announced the catastrophic loss of the personal records of 25m Britons. The entire Child Benefit database was exported onto disc and sent within the internal mail from the HMRC HQ in Washington, Tyne and Wear to the National Audit Office in London on the 18th October 2007.

Almost everyone who has a child under the age of 16 is affected along with older children still in full-time education.

It amazes me as to why there was such a delay for those affected to be informed of the blunder. According to a BBC News report, “Bosses at the Revenue were not told about what had happened until the 8 November … The Officials involved waited before informing their superiors in the hope that the discs would be found.”

As a parent to a child under the age of 16, I am astonished to discover the extent of what has occurred and the implications it may pose. I cannot believe that it is possible for an error as profound as this to occur in today’s world. We are continually advised by Government of the risks posed by online threats and to ensure that our documents and information is kept secure at all times; yet the biggest threat lies within the heart of Government itself - it’s employee’s. Many of the news reports state that it was due to a junior individual failing to follow procedure. In my view it should not have been possible for such an incident to occur. This information should never have left the HQ of the HMRC.

The 1998 Data Protection Act was designed to ensure that personal information was managed appropriately, however Stewart Mitchell’s report for PC Pro indicates that “the DPA appears powerless to force government or companies to accept their responsibilities”. Organisations are continually failing to secure the information in its possession. Stewart continues “In a recent study at the University of Glamorgan, 300 used disks purchased from the UK, Australia and the US were tested and four out of ten contained sensitive data, such as salary details, financial data, bank and credit account details and visa applications”. According to a report by Sky News, information of this nature could be worth around £5 per person. This values the data in excess of £60m and doesn’t take into account the losses that could potentially be experienced by every individual involved. The information contained on the discs includes names, dates of birth, bank and address details - everything a fraudster would require to set up bank accounts, carry out transactions or create a fake identity. The Government now seriously needs its procedures and security implementations and may also need to reassess its controversial identity card scheme. After all, if the Government can’t be trusted with the information it currently holds, can the electorate trust it with more detailed information?

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]